The Next Child Safety Crisis Will Not Be Solved by Taking Away the Phone

HomeSurviving DailyAbuse

The Next Child Safety Crisis Will Not Be Solved by Taking Away the Phone

Long before anybody could type a sentence into a machine and receive a realistic image seconds later, women and children already knew about grooming.

Don’t Be Tricked Into Serving What Would Never Save You
Why Survivors of Abuse Can’t Afford to Choose Political Candidates Like Party Entertainment (And the 15 Things That Actually Matter)
How Predators Use Technology to Target You and the People You Love
What Is Spiritual Violence? And Why We Must Talk About It
Not Every Ugly Moment Is Abuse: Why Survivors Need Us to Keep Our Language Precise

Long before anybody could type a sentence into a machine and receive a realistic image seconds later, women and children already knew about grooming.

MacBook Pro turned on

Photo by Andras Vas

Survivors knew about secrecy. Manipulation. Sexual coercion. Threats. Adults who tested one boundary and then another. Families that protected somebody everybody loved. Institutions that moved problems down the road. Communities that worried about their reputation while somebody vulnerable was trying to tell the truth.

Then powerful new technology arrived.

It did not find an empty house.

It found us.

1. Technology did not invent abuse. AI can increase speed, reach, realism and anonymity, but human beings brought exploitation into the technological age. If we blame the machine for everything, we may avoid examining what existed before it.

2. We cannot uninvent our way back to safety. One company can close. One application can be banned. One tool can disappear. Human knowledge does not disappear with it. Our safety plans must be strong enough to survive the arrival of the next technology.

3. Technology can accelerate an existing problem. Something does not have to cause a problem to make it worse. Technology may provide new ways to stalk, impersonate, humiliate, groom, sexualize images or manufacture convincing material. Those capabilities deserve serious safeguards without pretending the machine invented the desire to misuse them.

4. Human responsibility remains. “The technology allowed me to do it” cannot become the twenty-first-century version of “Everybody was doing it.” Tools have capabilities. Human beings make choices about how they use them.

5. Companies have responsibilities too. Human responsibility does not give designers a free pass. Companies should be expected to anticipate foreseeable misuse, build meaningful safeguards, and respond when their products are repeatedly exploited to harm people.

6. Survivors have already taught us something about innovation. Abuse adapts. A telephone can become harassment. A location service can become surveillance. A photograph can become blackmail. A shared bank account can become financial control.

The lesson is not to fear every tool.

The lesson is to study how power operates through tools.

7. Humanity has to develop alongside technology. Better technology alone will not give us better judgment, stronger boundaries, earlier intervention or the courage to confront people we care about.


Those are human muscles.

We need Survivors, researchers, technologists, clinicians, advocates, parents, educators and lawmakers working together. We need treatment where treatment can prevent harm and accountability when people choose to harm others.

Most of all, we need to stop waiting for technology to answer moral questions that belong to us.

AI may be able to generate an image, imitate a voice or manufacture something that once required considerably more effort.

It cannot decide what kind of people we intend to be.

We brought our unfinished human problems into the technological age. The work before us is not simply making smarter machines.

It is becoming wiser humans while we still have time.

Spread the love