If Every Man Gets to Ask Women Why They Said No, Where Does It End?

HomeWomanism/FeminismViolation

If Every Man Gets to Ask Women Why They Said No, Where Does It End?

There is an age when "Why?" is one of the sweetest and most exhausting words in the English language.Why is the sky blue?Why do dogs bark?

Sexual Assaults at American Festivals: Freaknik
Your Safety Is More Important Than Politeness.
Using Michelle Obama’s Image to Justify White Supremacy Is a Self-Own—And a Betrayal
Jennifer’s Law Exists Because Too Many Women Are Not Believed Until Too Late
Women Will Not Wait for Your Permission to Tell Our Own Stories

There is an age when “Why?” is one of the sweetest and most exhausting words in the English language.

Why is the sky blue?

Why do dogs bark?

Stylish black and white portrait of a woman against a stone wall in Rabat.

Photo by MAG Photography

Why do I have to go to bed?

Why can’t I have another cookie?

Absolutely adorable. Exhausting but adorable. We understand it because toddlers have been on this earth for less than five years. Everything is new. They are learning how the world works.

But grown women cannot spend their lives standing before grown men answering an endless chain of “But why won’t you date me?”

Because once we establish that a woman’s no requires a socially acceptable explanation, somebody else is going to want his hearing too.

So let’s imagine the line.


  • Men much older than her
  • Men much younger than her
  • Men old enough to be her father
  • Men old enough to be her grandfather
  • Her father’s or grandfather’s friends
  • Men who knew her when she was a child
  • Former babysitters, coaches, teachers, mentors, pastors, or other adults from her childhood
  • Her friends’ fathers
  • Her parents’ friends
  • Men she grew up viewing as family
  • Men who are related to her former partners
  • Coworkers
  • Supervisors or bosses
  • Employees or subordinates
  • Neighbors
  • Friends she only wants as friends
  • Her friends’ brothers
  • Men within her religious community
  • Men outside her religion
  • Men whose religious beliefs conflict with hers
  • Men whose political or moral values conflict with hers
  • Married men
  • Separated-but-not-divorced men
  • Men practicing polyamory or nonmonogamy
  • Men who want children
  • Men who do not want children
  • Men who already have children
  • Men with more children than she wants involved in her life
  • Men who want her to become a stepmother
  • Men who want marriage when she does not
  • Men who do not want marriage when she does
  • Men who want casual sex when she wants commitment
  • Men who want commitment when she does not
  • Men whose sexual expectations are incompatible with hers
  • Men whose relationship expectations are incompatible with hers
  • Men whose lifestyles she does not want
  • Men whose substance use she does not want around her
  • Men whose financial habits concern her
  • Men whose criminal history she does not want incorporated into her life
  • Men whose relationship history concerns her
  • Men whose behavior toward former partners concerns her
  • Men whose attitudes toward women concern her
  • Men whose ideas about household roles conflict with hers
  • Men who expect her to provide domestic labor she does not want to provide
  • Men who expect financial support she does not want to provide
  • Men who expect her to relocate
  • Men who expect her to abandon or reduce her career
  • Men who expect her to become a caregiver
  • Men whose family dynamics she does not want to marry into
  • Men who live too far away
  • Men who want long-distance relationships when she does not
  • Men she does not find physically attractive
  • Men whose personalities do not appeal to her
  • Men whose hygiene or grooming does not appeal to her
  • Men whose communication style exhausts her
  • Men whose social lives are incompatible with hers
  • Men whose ideas about privacy conflict with hers
  • Men who want considerably more contact, attention, or togetherness than she does
  • Men who want considerably less
  • Men she simply does not enjoy being around
  • Men who seem perfectly nice but produce no romantic feeling in her whatsoever
  • Men everyone else thinks she should want
  • Men who believe being successful should make them eligible
  • Men who believe being wealthy should make them eligible
  • Men who believe being educated should make them eligible
  • Men who believe being attractive should make them eligible
  • Men who believe being “a good guy” should make them eligible
  • Men who bought dinner and believe that should make them eligible
  • Men who have waited patiently and believe waiting should make them eligible
  • Men who supported her through something and believe that should make them eligible
  • Men who have been her friend for years and believe friendship should eventually become romance
  • Men who insist she has never given “men like me” a chance
  • Men who believe her previous relationships prove she should give them a chance
  • Men who believe another woman’s willingness should determine hers
  • Men who believe her previous willingness means she should be willing again
  • Men who believe her reason for saying no is shallow
  • Men who believe her reason is prejudiced
  • Men who believe her standards are too high
  • Men who believe she will regret saying no
  • Men who believe she would like them if she “gave it a chance”
  • Men who believe attraction can be negotiated
  • Men who believe her boundary needs to be interrogated
  • Men who believe rejection entitles them to an explanation
  • And men who simply cannot understand why “I don’t want to” is already an answer.

Maybe she’s perfectly fine with dating guys in these categories, but maybe she isn’t. Maybe not right now. Maybe never.


Women Are Holding the Line of Consent

The danger in requiring women to justify one category of rejection is that the principle doesn’t stay neatly inside that category. Once we say a woman owes an explanation for excluding these men, the next question becomes unavoidable:

Which men aren’t entitled to an explanation?

That is why the line has to be held farther back.

Before the arguments. Before the categories. Before somebody decides whether her reason is enlightened enough, compassionate enough, modern enough, rational enough or fair enough.

 

Consent cannot survive if “no” merely opens negotiations.

Women are not defending every reason every woman has ever given for rejecting somebody.

We are defending something more fundamental:

Her authority to decide.

Otherwise, we are raising a civilization of grown adults who approach women’s boundaries like toddlers who just discovered their favorite question.

Why?

But why?

Okay, but why?

Why not me?

Why not men like me?

What if I am different?

What if your reason isn’t good enough?

What if I think your boundary is unfair?

Toddlers get some grace. They’ve been here four years.

Grown adults have had considerably more time to learn one of life’s simplest lessons:

Sometimes another human being’s answer is no.

And the lesson after that is even simpler.

You don’t have to like her answer for it to belong to her.

Spread the love